Douglas J. Gladstone’s important new book, A Bitter Cup of Coffee, examines the plight of 874 Major League Baseball players who played between 1947 and 1979, all with brief trials in the majors—careers figuratively "just long enough to drink a cup of coffee." These men, the author suggests, have gulped bitter cups of coffee because they haven’t been included retroactively in the pension plan’s amended vesting requirement since adopted by the MLB Players Association.
At the collective bargaining table in 1980, the Major League Baseball owners made an offer to the union that, at first glance, would seem generous. It was a move that was intended to divide the union membership and bring about a settlement that would be favorable to the owners. Ultimately, the divide and conquer strategy failed as the union held together and accepted the offer. Unfortunately many former players would not share in the victory. Douglas J. Gladstone’s A Bitter Cup of Coffee is the story of 874 big league baseball players. Each of their careers lasted less than four year. Many, were simply “cups of coffee”. None of these men would collect a pension from Major League Baseball.
Starting in 1947, Major League Baseball offered a pension to any player with five years of service in the big leagues. In 1969, with Marvin Miller at the head of the Major League Baseball Player’s Association, the years of service needed was reduced to four years. Since service as a player, trainer or coach counted towards the pension, player’s who were close to qualifying would seek out a roster spot or a coaching position to get those last few days of service. Unfortunately, not everyone who was close was given this opportunity.
In the 1980 contract negotiations between the owners and the union, the owners would make their offer and the change would make the MLB pension plan generous to a point almost beyond belief. A player with even a single day of service in the big leagues would receive health care for the rest of their life. After just 43 days on a Major League roster, a player becomes eligible for the pension plan. A player with the minimum amount of service would earn around $34,000 a year. It certainly isn’t a king’s ransom, but for a player who didn’t make a fortune during a brief stay in the majors, it’s financial reassurance.
That reassurance was not available to those players who played before 1980. The owners certainly did not offer to make the changes to the pension plan retroactive and the union seemed unwilling to go to bat for their former union members and risk losing the offer for their current membership. Despite the ever-increasing amounts of money that both the owners and players have been raking in over the past three decades, there has been little movement to help out these players.
Helping them would certainly not be without precedent. Annuities were awarded by baseball to those players whose careers ended before the 1947 pension plan went into effect. Additionally, MLB attempted to right a wrong by awarding service time and consequently annuities as well to many former Negro League players. These moves are widely considered to have been just and overdue.

Asked if giving a pension to men such as himself is the right thing to do, Sadowski diplomatically answers that it’s not for him to say. However, he does volunteer that, given his assorted list of ailments, he could always use some more money to help defray expenses.
Gladstone on former Braves pitcher Bob Sadowski, from Chapter 1
Gladstone’s book is less a history of the pension plan and more the story of those remaining players who do not receive pensions. It is the story of former Braves pitcher Bob Sadowski, who has suffered from the aftermath of kidney failure and a stroke. It is the story of former Braves reliever Gary Neibauer, who despite his own ailments, works with the Major League Baseball Player’s Alumni Association to try and get a pension for his fellow players. It is the story of Craig Skok, another former Braves pitcher, who left the game a few weeks shy of qualifying, and thanks to the generosity of Ted Turner, was placed on the roster so that he could vest. It is the story of many of their contemporaries, their struggles in both life and in their attempt to get what Gladstone sees as their rightful pension. Some of the players are bitter, and others hopeful. All of their stories are compelling, and a few are even heartbreaking.
These players are clearly flesh and blood human beings and they do not all comes off as sympathetic. The bitterness occasionally expressed towards the payouts awarded to the former Negro League players seems especially misplaced. Still, this is their honest feeling. They are not looking to get rich. They are simply looking for something that acknowledges that their cup of coffee is as important to baseball as to those players who got a cup of coffee in the post-1980 game.
Will you agree with these players? Do you think they deserve the same pension rewards as those players who came in under the new plan? I don’t know and I can’t say for sure that I do. Stories like this bring up a wide range of emotions. Is it possible to be sympathetic towards these players and not believe they should receive a pension? Again, I don’t know. One thing I think we can all agree is that MLB and the MLBPA can certainly afford to help these guys out.
Even though he is a fervent supporter of these players, to his credit, Gladstone points out that these men are not owed anything. Major League Baseball has no legal obligation to pay them anything. They are not active members of the Player’s Association and the union has no obligation to provide these players legal services and cannot negotiate for them. Gladstone isn’t on a legal crusade. He’s on a moral one. With passion and unflinching honesty, A Bitter Cup of Coffee does a masterful job of both telling the story of those players without a pension and advocating on their behalf.
A deal was reached in April 2011 to begin to extend some limited benefits to these players. The benefits were originally scheduled to run through 2012, but they have been extended through 2016 in the most recent CBA. About this deal, Gladstone said, "I'm glad that these men will be getting something for the next five years but it still is anathema to me why neither the league nor the union want to do right by them and retroactively restore them all into pension coverage."
1 recs | 10 comments
Really?
Why should I have any sympathy for any of these guys?
Hizouse - February 9, 2012
I’m curious to see how these guys fared after their careers. Instating these guys’ pensions could cost the league up to $30M per year though, so not an inconsequential amount compared to roughly $500M yearly profit
someguy1 - February 9, 2012
I'd be for it...
These folks were recruited by MLB to choose baseball as their career. Plucked out of high school, they sacrificed their young adulthood to play the game. They lost valuable time that they could have used learning a trade, going to college, etc., because someone convinced them that they were good enough to chase their dream.
1980 is an arbitrary date. Though players were guaranteed nothing prior to those negotiations, I can’t see the justice in a player who spent a full season in the big leagues in 1979 getting nothing for his contributions while a guy that that spent 1/4 of a season in the majors in 1980 gets free health insurance and a pension.
I think the youngest of these players would have to be in their mid-50s, while the majority would be much older. I don’t see it as a terrible and continual financial burden to MLB, and the $40-50MM/year total is probably a fairly small amount in comparison to the costs of these types of players that the MLB is or will be shelling out for post-1980 guys.
In the end, I guess it’s sad to think that someone’s contribution to the game in 1979 is deemed less important than it is in 1980. I think a huge part of the beauty of the game is its history, something that MLB continually emphasizes. If history is truly as important to MLB as they claim it is, they are doing no favors to the sport by not helping these players.
-C
cthabeerman - February 9, 2012
Also, play one game, get health care for life?
The NFL wants their union.
Mr. Sanchez - February 9, 2012
The NFL's medical and pension plans
Are an appalling joke. Baseball is far better but it could still be improved.
Guys like this helped make the game what it is today. I’m sorry some people don’t seem to understand that being part of a union entails that you look out for people who have gone before and people who are yet to come, as well as yourself and your contemporaries.
Sam Jethroe - February 9, 2012
Only a small part of the story is being told.
Those players that we are supposed to feel sympathy for,were paid well into the nations upper percentile in wages during their professional baseball careers,whether or not they lasted very long on a major league roster.
They all made a personal choice to pursue baseball as a career.No different than anyone else choosing any other career.Some chose it in spite of advise that they had little chance of making it.Many chose it because it would pay relatively well for as long as they lasted.
dawg1060 - February 9, 2012
No, they didn’t. The minimum salary in MLB in 1975, for instance, was $16,000. That’s about $53-60K in today’s money. That’s for a year’s worth of service, but we’re talking prorated amounts. Compare that to today’s minimum salary of $480K. They were getting paid 1/8th of the money compared to today’s rookies.
Marginal MLB players were middle class at best during that era. This notion that athletes were paid handsomely is hogwash. Sure, the top players got paid some decent money, but the average salaried player back then was making the equivalent of 1/3 of the minimum salary of today.
Make no mistake, owners were making money hand-over-fist back then, off of the sweat of players that were not paid very well in return. The players simply didn’t have the union clout of today to take a greater part of the share.
-C
cthabeerman - February 9, 2012
The best then
would probably be equivalent, inflation, etc included to minimum salary guys now.
/I’m not doing the math though, 200,000,000!
Mr. Sanchez - February 9, 2012
Rec'd
Every word of that is golden.
Sam Jethroe - February 9, 2012
Sorry disconnected
continuing,
some had very little talent,some didn’t work hard enough,some failed to meet the minimum requirements to hold ANY job,some drank too much,some couldn’t show up for practice or team buses on time and after their time is over,they are overcome with envy and the sense of entitlement that has a firm hold on the rest of society.
I’d say that MLB has gone too far into entitlement land already.So we are supposed to think that just cup of coffee is supposed to entitle players to a lifetime of retirement benefits.
Absurd.
dawg1060 - February 9, 2012
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Talking Chop to post a comment.