In reading all of the prospect lists and reviews last week one particular statement caught my eye, and hasn't escaped my mind since then. Interestingly, this statement wasn't about an Atlanta Braves prospect, it was about Brandon Beachy. Strangely, this curmudgeonly view of a young Braves player didn't come from Keith Law, it came from Kevin Goldstein's post. Here was his line about Beachy, found in the Top-10 Talents 25 and Under section of his Braves prospect post (sub. req.):
The general industry thought on Beachy is that he's good but not as good as his 2011 season, and regression is a good assumption.
My gut told me not to agree with that, and my memory told me that the opposite seemed to be true. So I thought I'd poke around my memory and Baseball Reference and see what I could find that would support the opposite of that statement.
Brandon Beachy faced the Phillies in his first big league start in 2010. He faced them again in his third big league start. Then again in his fifth big league start in 2011, and three other times last year. In 28 big league starts, Beachy has faced the Phillies six times. If that above statement about regression carried any weight, then the Phillies should be getting the better of Brandon since they've seen him more than any other team. But his starts against them tell a different story.
It's hard to analyze his 2010 starts, since they were emergency starts at the end of the year, after Beachy had pretty much been shut down for the season. Still, he improved from his Major League debut to his third game. He faced more batters, lowered his walks, raised his strikeout total, improved his Game Score from 45 to 47, and seemed a better pitcher. At the very least he didn't regress while facing the same team twice in a span of two weeks (in the pressure cooker of a pennant race).

With much of the same team returning for Philly in 2011, the experienced Phillies lineup should have been familiar with Beachy, and if he were to regress after big league batters see him for the second or third time, then the Phillies would be the first team to break through against him, and find the chinks in his armor.
Beachy's second start of his 2011 campaign came against, who else, the Phillies. In many ways it was one of Beachy's most efficient starts, as he needed only 78 pitchers to get through six innings. But a leadoff double in the seventh chased Beachy, and the bullpen couldn't keep the game close. His game score was only 42, as the Phillies were able to touch him up for a key fourth inning 2-run home run.
The next time Beachy faced the Phillies in mid-May was Beachy's shortest outing of his career, just two innings, but we're not going to consider this game because Beachy suffered a strained left oblique muscle, was forced to exit in the third inning, and spent the next five weeks on the disabled list. The Phillies did get to Beachy early in the first inning, and he was again victimized by the home run, so it certainly seemed like the Phillies were catching up to Beachy, and proving that he was poised for regression once a team seems him several times.
A healthy Beachy would face the Phillies twice more down the stretch in 2011, and each time was better than the last. His fourth start back from the DL saw him in Philly where he posted a game score of 54, and was again economical with his pitches through six innings. In his first start against the Phillies in 2011, Beachy had gotten 14 strikes looking and 8 swings and misses. In this his third start against the Phillies in 2011, Beachy increased those numbers to 18 strikes looking and 10 swings and misses.
In Beachy's final start of the year against the Phillies, and already the sixth of his young career, Beachy posted his highest game score against Philadelphia, a 67. He struck out more Phillies (7) than he ever had in any start against them, and got 7 swings and misses and 25 strikes looking -- his highest total at that point in his Major League career.
His game scores in starts against Philly go like this: 45-47-42-32(injured)-54-67.
His strikes looking in each start go like this: 15-17-14-9(injured)-18-25.
Those last two starts against Philadelphia were by far his best against them, and they tell the story of a pitcher who gets better against a team the more he faces them. Those numbers don't support the narrative of a pitcher who will regress as the league sees more and more of him.
He improved against Washington last year, facing them twice and going from a 40 to a 51 game score.
He improved against Florida, posting games scores of 38, 77, 67, and 43, though still striking out 10 batters in each of his last two starts against them.
Like most of the 2011 Braves, Beachy faded some down the stretch last year. But that was his first full year as a starting pitcher, and it was more innings than he had thrown the year before. He's a young pitcher who only has 50 professional starts under his belt (Majors and minors), and is someone who is still learning on the mound, and still learning how good his raw ability is.
If his six career starts against the Phillies are any indication, then Beachy will have a better 2012 as he sees hitters multiple times and is able to strike them out with more frequency. The "general industry thought" hasn't looked deep enough into Beachy's starts, and hasn't seen his improvement against a team he's already seen. Not to mention that the Phillies are one of the best hitting teams in baseball. Therefore, my thought is that regression is a poor assumption for Brandon Beachy in 2012. The "industry" needs to catch up.
0 recs | 49 comments
Career Minor League K/9 is 10.0 and the MLB rate is 10.6
I think he’ll be just fine.
another simpsons avatar - February 12, 2012
This...
As long as his fastball has excellent movement…he will continue striking batters out.
TBuzz - February 12, 2012
I almost think he'll improve...
He underperformed his FIP and SIERA last year, his strand rate was a tad low, and his BABIP was .307, which doesn’t seem high, but considering his Fly Ball rate of 45% you could expect BABIP to normally hover around .280ish. He improved his swinging strike rate from his brief 2010 call up, and if he can continue in that direction he’ll maintain the strikeouts, no problem.
ElJosharino - February 12, 2012
Yeah, speaking strictly of his ERA, he should almost definitely improve. I doubt he improves on his SIERA though. I can see his peripherals regressing a bit closer to the mean but him also getting better results.
BenDuronio - February 13, 2012
Other than the injury bug hitting him, I don’t see Beachy regressing at all other than maybe strikeouts as the year passes along. I think there’s even a good chance he’ll improve a bit.
Scott Coleman - February 12, 2012
P.S. Nice writeup, Martin.
Scott Coleman - February 12, 2012
well researched
I have been of the opinion also that we could expect some regression, not only from opponents seeing more of him, but especially because of how quick he is to the plate in his delivery. I hope you’re right
Rodrda01 - February 12, 2012
I don’t see any reason a 3.68 ERA and 1.207 WHIP won’t be easy for Beachy to repeat.
roberty - February 12, 2012
hmmm....
I just think its hate on Atlanta week after Keith Law’s report… I think Beachy is a diamond in the rough. I sure hope we lead the league in era and whip just to shut the haters up. I think Beachy has the stuff to strike out 200 a year.
darthspiderman - February 12, 2012
sorry for the "I think Beachy" redundancy... this bar exam is killin my brain cells. pun not intended?
darthspiderman - February 12, 2012
It’s been that way for @ 700 weeks straight.
Sam Jethroe - February 14, 2012
touche
darthspiderman - February 14, 2012
I think people continue to think this about Beachy
Because they think he has average “stuff” and his strikeout totals were completely based on deception. I’d point those people to this article http://capitolavenueclub.com/?p=5265. and I’d also state that he’s only started 50 games in his professional career, it’s the same sort of improvement expected of a prospect who hasn’t started in that many games
JHey1212 - February 12, 2012
great link
Thanks for the post. Encouraging about Beachy. The PitchFX numbers are fascinating and it’s amazing they can tabulate such things. Went to PitchFX partner Complete Game Consulting for more info and found this interesting New York Times story and computer graphic about the movement of Mariano Rivera’s unique pitch http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/06/29/magazine/rivera-pitches.html
JimK - February 12, 2012
He just needs to go deeper into games
That’s the difference between him and a better starter.
FineHamAbounds - February 12, 2012
to be honest
i think Fredi and the Braves FO were just trying to hold on to as many games as they could and gave him a short leash
drumzalicious - February 12, 2012
Not the way I saw his games going last year...
His pitch counts always ran high by the 5th or 6th inning, and since our offense was continually tied or behind it never gave him the opportunity to pitch that extra inning.
Considering BB frequently seems to get hitters into 0-2 and 1-2 counts he’s still hellbent on wasting pitches out of the zone trying to strike guys out. With his sinking fastball, he should be pitching to contact a little more.
TBuzz - February 12, 2012
The game I attended in Chicago
It wasn’t Beachy but Fredi that caused him to leave. He struggled a bit in one inning, which had his pitch count at 97 through 6, and he was getting stronger as he went. However, Fredi had a recently-called-up new toy in Arodys Vizcaino and the bottom of the Cubs lineup coming up, so he brought him in for some work.
I watched only one other Beachy start from start to finish, and that was his July 8th start vs. the Phillies in Philadelphia where he went 6 strong and had only 83 pitches. That was a tie ballgame that Kimbrel was not available for, so it would have made sense to have Beachy face the top of the lineup in the 7th and save EOF and Venters for 8-9, but that wasn’t the decision, and lo and behold, the Proctologist lost them the game in extras.
As far as pitching to strikeouts, I don’t know that is his intent. He’s a flyball pitcher by nature as his fastball may be classified as sinking, but it has a TON of movement. When stressed and pressed, it flattens out, however, so I would say that his own mental makeup is part of why some 0-2, 1-2 fastballs become hittable rather than out pitches. This creates a bunch of flyball outs, typically not with perfect contact because even flattened some, the fastball is tough to get a perfect barrell on. I was surprised in the Chicago game I was at with the pitch calls, though. The team often called odd pitch sequences with Beacy, odd to me, and odd to those sitting around me cheering on the home team. Last I knew, McCann takes most calls from the dugout, so that would be a selection thing of the coaching staff.
biggentleben - February 13, 2012
Beachy's FB
I’m pretty sure Beachy’s fastballs are almost exclusively 4-seamers, which are not sinkers. In fact FanGraphs (and Capitol Avenue Club) has noted that Beachy’s fastball has one of the greatest vertical deflections in the game. As in, his fastball appears to rise as it gets on the batter. The amount of rise is unusual in today’s game and accounts for the fact that his FB seems to get more swinging strikes that velocity alone would suggest.
DK8 - February 13, 2012
He only throws a four-seamer. He has the four standard pitches, with his slider being the highest quality secondary offering. The changeup is solid, but he allows a bit too much contact with it. The curveball needs some tightening, commanded that pitch the worst last year, though he did get a good amount of called strikes with it.
BenDuronio - February 13, 2012
The curve
When it’s on is RIDICULOUS, on the level of untouchable. The day I saw him it at Wrigley, it was completely on, and it completely befuddled batters. However, I watched only a couple of his games, and despite pitching well in the other game I saw, the curve was inconsistent. I’m not sure if it’s a feel thing or what, but it would be great if he could get hold of that, because he could even possibly surpass the k/9 of his 2011.
biggentleben - February 13, 2012
Yep.
When you hit ~100 pitches at the end of the 5th, you’re asking to get pulled. He strikes out so many that he’s going to have higher pitch counts, but there’s a difference between striking a guy out on 6-7 pitches and on 4-5. Over a game, that adds up to another inning or two.
FineHamAbounds - February 13, 2012
Beachy is one of my top fantasy sleepers. He’s got this!
jwrocks - February 12, 2012
Goldstein is reputable
Probably one of the few that I’d give creedance to on Beachy as I remember on his podcast that he gave a great breakdown of how the industry missed on Beachy, and he spoke very highly of Beachy’s development and character, stating that he really liked him. I don’t think he’d toss out comments lightly, though he didn’t exactly say it was HIS thought, but it was the industry consensus that Beachy regresses some.
biggentleben - February 13, 2012
I was speaking in generalities...
for Beachy haters. Goldstein is a solid source and my bad for not being more clear on who I was targeting.
jwrocks - February 13, 2012
Regress to what? The idea of regression implies that we have something to compare it to. Beachy doesn’t have any track record besides the good performance he would regress from.
GumpBrave - February 13, 2012
well said
alxn - February 13, 2012
Regress toward the mean
It’s a very common usage. For an above average pitcher like Beachy, they mean that he’ll be less good.
Bronn - February 13, 2012
Right but we have no idea what his mean is was my point.
GumpBrave - February 13, 2012
But we know what the league-wide mean is
That’s what people are talking about.
Bronn - February 13, 2012
Fair enough to use that as a general barometer, but these performances do not occur in a vacuum with the league average as a control. The pitcher performs independently of the league-wide average, with his skill and particular talents determining the deviation.
My point was that Beachy has showed tons of upside that suggests that he can maintain a high performance and create a norm above league average.
GumpBrave - February 13, 2012
Yeah, like Bronn said, in this case the mean for the league is what he was referencing. Often times it is for a pitcher’s career though.
BenDuronio - February 13, 2012
Great read!
Thank you for the article gondee
jdelsandro - February 13, 2012
I hope he progresses....all the way to getting the opening day start.
Just like Smoltz, I think he’s a diamond in the rough that Atlanta has found.
rxadam - February 13, 2012
Smoltz was highly regarded
He was no diamond in the rough.
biggentleben - February 13, 2012
Doyle Alexander
on the other hand…
UMDBHIK - February 13, 2012
Beachy throws 4 different pitches although the fastball is easily the best. Bobby Cox was super impressed by Beachy, more than I ever heard Bobby say about a prospect. He will be better than just fine and I hope the Braves stretch him out to pitch 7 innings.
The Rap - February 13, 2012
He led all pitchers with over 140 IP in K/9 in 2011. If he was a highly touted prospect, the entire baseball community would be going apeshit over him, but nobody likes to admit they were wrong.
alxn - February 13, 2012
I think he’ll be the best starter in 2011. I think his strikeouts might come down a bit, that mark was extraordinary, but his walks will probably come down a bit as well.
BenDuronio - February 13, 2012
If he or Hanson can learn to be more effecient with their pitches
they immediately become our best starter. Of course, it’s almost like picking your favorite ice cream if JJ regains his healthy form, and Hudson can get his 2010 on.
Mr. Sanchez - February 13, 2012
Not sure if I would bet on Hudson to be at that level with the infield defense the Braves are putting behind him.
BenDuronio - February 13, 2012
Agreed
but it’s not like we had amazing IF D in 2010 either, aside from SS.
Mr. Sanchez - February 13, 2012
He posted his highest K/BB of his career. If he can replicate that he won’t be in trouble too much, but with the back surgery and age of Chipper + Freeman putting on weight, the infield d should hurt him a bit. He’ll still probably be really good, but I’d expect an ERA a bit higher than what we’ve seen the past two years. Posting something on fangraphs about this tomorrow.
BenDuronio - February 13, 2012
Looking forward to reading it
Mr. Sanchez - February 13, 2012
Hmmmm
I just don’t see Beachy as the efficiency issue, but I already stated this issue before. Many times he was pulled before he could achieve 7+ innings, so I’m not sure it was his issue.
biggentleben - February 13, 2012
Both Hanson and Beachy had the highest pitches per PA for the Braves. There is some merit to him being relatively inefficient, but that should get toned down with more exposure to the league. His slider becoming a more frequently used pitch will likely help with that. For Tommy, it will probably come with developing either his curveball or changeup a bit more. If he throws his curveball for a strike more frequently, he should see deeper innings totals.
BenDuronio - February 13, 2012
My curiousity in watching Beachy was the pitch calling with him, and some of that blew up his pitch count. Also, I do think, like I mentioned before, stabilizing his pressure handle at 2 strikes could really help his efficiency.
biggentleben - February 13, 2012
Strikeout pitchers, of course, tend to throw more pitches in general
The issue for Beachy was that he didn’t have one single pitch with which to finish guys off when he got ahead. I feel like he could do a bit better in that regard next year. You don’t want to risk throwing too good a pitch when you’re ahead in the count, of course, but it helps if you can force a swing and miss. He had a lot of pitches fouled off while he was ahead too, it seemed.
One thing I might try, if I were Brian McCann, was calling more fastballs on those 0-2, 1-2 counts. He went with a lot of sliders and change-ups (I’m not sure where to check that), and while those are effective enough, sometimes it might be speeding up the hitter’s bat.
Bronn - February 13, 2012
Check his pitch counts
they aren’t low. Maybe if we were willing to let him approach 150, or just exceed 120s, and he could go deeper. But he was around 100 after 5 or 6. He averaged just over 17 pitches per inning last year, which has him exceeding 100 pitches after 6 innings (and for comparison, Hanson was at 16.67 per inning last year, and slightly less but still over 16 per the year before). Unless we let Beachy wear his arm out throwing 120+ pitches per outing, he won’t be going any deeper in games until he learns how to cut down on the pitches. If he or Hanson can cut that below 15 per inning, we’ll see them going 7, 8+ innings more often. But as is, they both need to become more effecient before becomming true horses at the front of a rotation.
Mr. Sanchez - February 13, 2012
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Talking Chop to post a comment.