After coming to terms with Eric O`Flaherty last night and Michael Bourn this morning, Frank Wren and the Braves wrapped up a busy 12 hours or so by coming to terms with Jair Jurrjens on a one-year deal worth $5.5 million.
The deal, first reported here by the guys over at MLB Trade Rumors, also has incentives that will give Jurrjens $25,000 each time for reaching 175, 180, 190, 200, 210, and 215 innings pitched in 2012.
With Jurrjens signed, the Braves have now signed all of their arbitration eligible players for the 2012 season.
0 recs | 36 comments
Nicely done.
Now, let’s play some ball!
I cannot wait for Spring Training.
Jman781 - January 17, 2012
So...
Braves 2012 = Braves 2011 – Brooksy – Sea Bass + TP
TBuzz - January 17, 2012
- DLowe
BravesFan-Venezuela - January 17, 2012
- S. Proctor and - Parrish
bravesdude - January 17, 2012
- KK :)
jgg420 - January 17, 2012
Oops .
Forgot that one .
bravesdude - January 17, 2012
Seems a tad high
drumzalicious - January 17, 2012 via mobile
Nah, he’s worth every penny.
Broccoman - January 17, 2012
I like the incentives . If he can actually make it to 200 innings , he’ll earn another $1M .
bravesdude - January 17, 2012
Another $100K. Incentive to like the incentives even more…
-C
cthabeerman - January 17, 2012
Thats right .
It was another $25,000 every 25 innings . I don’t know where I got another $1m from .
bravesdude - January 17, 2012
Wouldn't it be interesting if Starting pitchers got paid by their IP?
TBuzz - January 17, 2012
You’d see guys throwing a “Big Z” tantrum in the dugout every time they got pulled in the 5th with 2 guys on.
Fatvirus - January 17, 2012
I believe it was $150K at the max of 210 IP
king of games - January 17, 2012
215 IP*
king of games - January 17, 2012
That’s correct, I was just covering the amount for 200 IP.
-C
cthabeerman - January 17, 2012
Wow so far these offseason moves have really got me fired up
Adam_S - January 17, 2012
This is a good bit higher than I expected
For a guy who’s been hurt each of the last two seasons, and didn’t pitch all that well in one of them. I guess I underestimated the Scott Boras effect…which is partially why I keep thinking Jurrjens will get traded.
I like the incentives structure, but it’s really chump change, maxing out at $150 K. I feel like the incentive structure should have been tripled, with a base salary closer to $4.75 million. When I guessed he would make $4.75 million previously, I thought I was on the high end because the guy had been hurt.
Honestly, I feel like the Braves should have gone to arbitration rather than sign this one-I feel like a guy’s injury history is one big thing you can take to the arbitration board to win points.
Bronn - January 17, 2012
The injury thing
should have hepled our cause in salary seeing how it has obviously affected his value in the trade market .
bravesdude - January 17, 2012
exactly
Bronn - January 17, 2012
mlbtraderumors had him projected at 5.1 mil so it is a litle higher than expected. Boras probably had something to do with that.
airman in bama - January 17, 2012
Prado got a little more than projected too, I wonder if they bumped them up for having to read all the trade rumors this off season.
bighop - January 17, 2012
probably more because of their actual perceived value the team, wanting to be very fair, and also wanting to avoid the enmity that tends to fester after a Boras-inspired arbitration blood-letting.
fandave - January 17, 2012
I was going off the thought last year, that D Lowe got the opening day start because his name had been floated during the off-season. You’re probably right though, their value is pretty high.
bighop - January 17, 2012
Prado's only slightly above what you'd project
Jurrjens is what I’d call significantly higher. I don’t get it, with a guy who’s been hurt twice in two years and spent one of those not pitching very well.
Bronn - January 17, 2012
But he was an All Star
a shiny tag like that has to look good in front of the arbitrator.
Mr. Sanchez - January 17, 2012
That's when I start floating out the advanced stats
But that usually only works out in favor of players, seldom in favor of the team. I’d still have taken my chances there, I think. I doubt he could have gotten much more than this-it seems like a good risk/reward endeavor.
Bronn - January 17, 2012
It doesn’t work in arbitration, period. The arbitration officials are not baseball guys, they’re lawyers and judges without any ties to the game. I don’t like the Braves shot of winning arbitration when Scott Boras can say 50-33, 3.40 ERA, and an all-star appearance at the age of 25. If you don’t know a lot about the game, that sounds pretty incredible…
-C
cthabeerman - January 17, 2012
I've heard anecdotes
That certain guys have started trying to use advanced stats to gain leverage in arbitration, and that it works for players. At least, to demonstrate how they’re better than the standard numbers might indicate.
Bronn - January 17, 2012
Also
I feel like saying, “Well, yes, but the guy has gotten hurt twice and missed significant time after both injuries, and his value on the trade market has suffered as a result” would be a great rebuttal, to the arbitration board.
Bronn - January 17, 2012
Hey...
Moylan’s back!
TomahawkGuy - January 17, 2012
awesome news
and he is signed to a team friendly contract as well to boot
love that guy
LEastCoastBears - January 17, 2012
Can someone please explain arbitration in lehman's terms.
As dumbed down as possible because I really don’t understand it. I’ve tried, but I have not gotten anywhere.
Thanks peeps!
Cammando2317 - January 17, 2012
I'll give it a shot
Years 1-3:
You are under team control. You get paid what they give you, which is typically league minimum, with a nominal raise each year. Typically, prior to the new CBA, it tended to look like: $419k, ~450k, ~$500k
Years 4-6/7:
Arbitration years. Depending on the call-up date and service time accrual, a player is entitled to three or four arbitration years. In arbitration years teams use stats and other measures to a player’s value, and offers them a figure. The player can accept it, and then there’s no issue, or in most cases, the player wants more money, and they ask for something higher. If no agreement can be reached by team and player, they go to arbitration, where a bunch of non-baseball lawyers and business heads listen to both sides, and they decide what the player is worth. At this point what these people choose to side with is what the player plays for.
Think of arbitration as court; two sides against one another, and it’s an invasive process that both parties typically want to avoid at all costs, because the player wants to know why he’s not making what he wants, and the team bringing out all of the negative reasons to justify why they don’t want to give it to him. This is primarily why it’s always a good thing to see headlines saying “so and so avoided arbitration by settling to X deal.”
With each year in arbitration, there is a minimum raise that is mandatory, the numbers I’m not up to speed with. For example EOF went from Arb 1 ~$900k to Arb 2 ~$2M (<100%) for doing well, whereas Jesus Flores, being mostly an injury risk went from just Arb 2 $750k to Arb 3 $850k.
In superstar cases, like Joey Votto, entering his first Arbitration year would have warranted gigantic money, so the Reds instead signed him to a three year deal which bought out all of his arbitration years (he was called up early, therefore had no Arb 4 year eligibility), which gave Votto stability in knowing he’d get paid no matter what for three years, and the Reds some potential salary relief if Votto contributes more statistically than what he’s being paid in the three years.
Non-tendering in the midst of arbitration years makes players free agents early. As in the case of Peter Moylan, it was mandatory for the Braves to give him a raise from his $2M salary, as he was entering his arb 3 year. But being an injury risk, the Braves didn’t want to do such, so they non-tendered him, making him a free agent. At this point, they were allowed to re-sign him for a cheaper deal, to protect themselves from a larger financial loss if he turns out to be still hurting, or ineffective. But typically, any really useful or good player doesn’t get non-tendered in the first place.
Year 7 or 8, depending on service time accrued:
And after all the arbitration years are done, a player is now a free agent.
royhobbs - January 17, 2012
Thanks alot hobbs.
Cammando2317 - January 22, 2012
Rec'd
Great explanation, thanks
niceguy876 - January 19, 2012
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Talking Chop to post a comment.