SB Nation - Login for mobile commenting

Talking Chop

Tim Hudson: Atlanta Braves 2010 Player Preview

This player preview was written by Thomas Grantham, who posts here as granman29.

On first glance it appears as though Tim Hudson's numbers have regressed since coming over to the National League from Oakland in 2005. In his six seasons with the A's, the sinkerballer had one of the major's best winning percentages going 92-39 (.702) while posting a 3.30 ERA. In fact, the only two pitchers in the American League over that same stretch with better winning percentages (min. 75 starts) were Johan Santana (.705) and Pedro Martinez (.766). However, since being traded to Atlanta at the prime age of 29, Hudson has gone just 56-36 (.589) with an ERA of 3.77. But judging his performance based on these statistics alone would be archaic at best, so let's dig a little deeper into the numbers.

If we advance under the assumption that a pitcher has a minimal effect on how balls put in play are hit, examining Hudson's strikeout, walk, and homerun rates in his time with Oakland versus Atlanta helps explain the spike in ERA. While his BB/9 and HR/9 ratios have stayed relatively constant between the two places, Hudson has struck out only 5.5 batters per nine innings in Atlanta compared to 6.5 in Oakland. This comes as a bit of a surprise considering Hudson gets to face a pitcher about three times a start with Atlanta as opposed to a designated hitter in his Oakland days. So for every 200 innings Huddy has pitched with Atlanta, he has allowed 22 more balls in play on average than with Oakland. Although Hudson's primary pitch is a sinkerball whose primary purpose is to produce grounders, getting 22 less "sure outs" over the course of a season makes him significantly more dependent on his defense.

Recently the Braves have had a very respectable defensive infield anchored by Yunel at short (ask Bill James or Baseball Prospectus, not UZR), and Hudson's last three injury hampered seasons have reflected this. This solid defensive play behind him must continue if Hudson is to put up the kinds of numbers Braves fans expect from him. Fortunately, Huddy seems to have fully recovered from season ending Tommy John surgery in 2008 and has experienced no major setbacks. Additionally Hudson has pitched 14 spectacular innings this Spring (for what it's worth), striking out 13 batters in 14 IP while only issuing one free pass and posting a 1.93 ERA. If he can avoid giving up the long ball and produce a favorable SO/BB ratio, the former All-American pitcher at Auburn should expect to return to his old form.

Nice review by Thomas.

0 recs  |  5 comments

Comments

Excited to have Huddy back in full swing… He’s a great pitcher and a great samaritan (sp?)… Hoping he has a great year!

I think Hudson will be fine as long as he is healthy. If Chipper stays healthy, I don’t think there is any way he has as bad a year in the field as he did last year. Yunel is very good at short, and Prado is at least passable at 2B. We don’t know about Glaus yet, but jeez, the Phils get away with Ryan Howard’s fielding “abilities”, so as long as Troy is adequate, that should be of help to Hud. Seems that the outfield defense carries a lot more worries than the infield this year.

With Heyward and Melky in the mix...

I think OF defense will be improved. McLouth/Cabrera in CF is solid, while Heyward should be an upgrade over French and Diaz/Cabrera a significant improvement from the professional hitter. Doesn’t exactly seem like the 99 Mets around the IF, or the Mariners OF last year, but still a solid defensive unit if healthy.

One thing I’d disagree with is the argument of “a pitcher has a minimal effect on how balls put in play are hit”. I can agree the pitcher has little effect on the defense aside from himself, and not much more effect on where the ball is hit, but as to how balls are hit I think they can have a much more significant effect by keeping hitters off balance, working both sides of the plate, having late movement, etc. Great pitchers are more than just strikeout artists, hence the idea of pitcher vs. thrower.

"[A] pitcher has a minimal effect on how balls put in play are hit".

Greg Maddux would like a word with the writer of this article.

From people that know a lot more about this stuff than I

http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=883

You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Talking Chop to post a comment.