The Braves begin their new postseason quest tonight, I just hope they get more hits than the Reds did last night (a lot more). Let's take a look at the projected lineups for each team versus tonight's starting pitchers. Again, these are not the official lineups, but my best guess as to what they will look like:
| Braves vs. Tim Lincecum | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | BA | OBP | SLG | OPS |
| Omar Infante, 3B | 11 | 11 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | .364 | .364 | .455 | .818 |
| Jason Heyward, RF | 6 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | .200 | .333 | .400 | .733 |
| Derrek Lee, 1B | 17 | 16 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | .375 | .412 | .500 | .912 |
| Brian McCann, C | 22 | 21 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 7 | .381 | .409 | .667 | 1.076 |
| Alex Gonzalez, SS | 7 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | .429 | .429 | .857 | 1.286 |
| Nate McLouth, LF | 6 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | .167 | .167 | .333 | .500 |
| Brooks Conrad, 2B | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 |
| Rick Ankiel, CF | 12 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | .182 | .250 | .273 | .523 |
Yes, small sample sizes they are, but at least it's good to see that most of these guys have at least faced Lincecum. Because of his whip-like motion he can be tough to pick up for hitters who have never faced him before. Not only have many of our batters seen a good deal of Lincecum, but about half of them have had some success off of him. He's still as tough as they come.
My intuition tells me that we'll need to get to Lincecum early in the game when he might be more amped up (this is his first postseason game, after all), and get an early lead and try to hold onto it before he settles into his rhythm. Easier said than done.
The rest of the Braves lineup versus Lincecum, and the Giants lineup versus Lowe are after the jump...

| Braves vs. Tim Lincecum | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | BA | OBP | SLG | OPS |
| Melky Cabrera | 6 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | .167 | .167 | .167 | .333 |
| Eric Hinske | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | .200 | .333 | .800 | 1.133 |
| Martin Prado | 6 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | .333 | .333 | .500 | .833 |
| Diory Hernandez | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | .250 | .250 | .250 | .500 |
| Matt Diaz | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | .333 | .333 | .333 | .667 |
| Troy Glaus | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1.000 | .667 | 2.000 | 2.667 |
Even Diory has a hit off of him!
Here is my projected Giants lineup versus Derek Lowe:
| Giants vs. Derek Lowe | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | BA | OBP | SLG | OPS |
| Andres Torres, CF | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | .667 | .750 | 1.000 | 1.750 |
| Freddy Sanchez, 2B | 17 | 17 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | .176 | .176 | .176 | .353 |
| Aubrey Huff, 1B | 40 | 38 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 2 | 2 | .263 | .300 | .500 | .800 |
| Buster Posey, C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Pat Burrell, LF | 22 | 21 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | .333 | .364 | .429 | .792 |
| Juan Uribe, SS | 8 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | .500 | .625 | .667 | 1.292 |
| Jose Guillen, RF | 20 | 19 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | .158 | .200 | .158 | .358 |
| Pablo Sandoval, 3B | 10 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | .400 | .400 | .400 | .800 |
A smattering of success, and a great deal of familiarity between Lowe and Huff. This will be a tough lineup, even with some of these guys slumping at the end of the season. Here are the reserves:
| Giants vs. Derek Lowe | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | BA | OBP | SLG | OPS |
| Aaron Rowand | 27 | 23 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 | .478 | .556 | .522 | 1.077 |
| Edgar Renteria | 17 | 16 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | .250 | .294 | .313 | .607 |
| Cody Ross | 13 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | .300 | .462 | .400 | .862 |
| Mike Fontenot | 11 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | .400 | .400 | .600 | 1.000 |
| Travis Ishikawa | 9 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | .111 | .111 | .222 | .333 |
| Eli Whiteside | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 |
| Nate Schierholtz | 5 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .200 | .200 | .200 | .400 |
| Eugenio Velez | 5 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | .500 | .600 | .750 | 1.350 |
Even with the season-long slump, Rowand will be on the postseason roster. Does Bochy dare start him against Lowe? Overall I wonder if any of these stats against Lowe matter with the way Lowe is pitching lately. He's been a different pitcher with his modified delivery, so that may play differently to many of these Giants hitters.
Gonna be a crazy day.
0 recs | 22 comments
Newly released footage of Timmy...
sddbaker - October 7, 2010
awesome
I love this.
scorby911 - October 7, 2010
Rec'd
king of games - October 7, 2010
Coming to a theater near you:
Jackass 3D!
UMDBHIK - October 7, 2010
This is just beautiful. McCann has made Lincecum his bitch.
justincredubil02 - October 7, 2010
I vote we get Esco back for tonight's game
I miss me that HR he had off Lincecum last year. It was an absolute bomb.
Scott Coleman - October 7, 2010 via mobile
Wow, you actually called him Esco.
GoBravesNY - October 7, 2010
Would you like me to call him Pablo instead?
Scott Coleman - October 7, 2010 via mobile
The pelican has grown stale, so I'm going to start my own thing.
Gary Gnu.
UMDBHIK - October 7, 2010
ISWYDT
Get a gnu attitude
carpengui - October 7, 2010
It was also a reference to this guy:
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_pZ4xYjNIFYQ/SXCULjJaxHI/AAAAAAAAANI/D-Y4vTatsdA/s400/garygnu.jpg
Stupid work computer not permitting me to allow popups.
UMDBHIK - October 7, 2010
I say we channel our inner Fucknuts
GoBravesNY - October 7, 2010
looks like a new vonage commercial.....
Shoert - October 7, 2010
In a pitchers duel, anything can happen....
Braves need to execute small ball tactics like it did during the Twins series in May. Push runners over and get them in. Reason why Heyward should not (I REPEAT SHOULD NOT) be batting 2nd. We need Omar to get on and have the next guy move him over to third. Ugh!!!!! Baseball Gods, please let the Braves bat show up for this series.
romone_braves91 - October 7, 2010
My bad I meant second but third could work as well. lol
romone_braves91 - October 7, 2010
The 2-hole has the most influence on scoring. Heyward should stay where he is. This message repeats.
SS451 - October 7, 2010
I think these stats are better for us.
Our batters who have faced Lincecum a lot have had success, while the Giants who have faced Lowe a lot have struggled, with the exception of Rowand.
StapleGun - October 7, 2010
I checked over at the McCovey Chronicles – they are worried about Rowand given that Lowe now has his slider working well.
carpengui - October 7, 2010
BOO Small sample size stats, RAWR!!!1
Yakker - October 7, 2010
I agree with your intuition. The Braves just need to be patient and try to scratch out an early run to get the Giants on their heels.
nuftjedi - October 7, 2010
And further, they need to have a better approach than the Reds did yesterday. That was the most pathetic playoff baseball I’ve ever witnessed.
UMDBHIK - October 7, 2010
Small sample sizes or not...
You’d be hard pressed to find a lineup with better numbers off Lincecum. I see J-Hey putting one in the bay.
The Keith Lockhart Era - October 7, 2010
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Talking Chop to post a comment.