Ezra Shaw - Getty Images
Rick Ankiel may have underwhelmed with the bat overall, but this was still one of the most memorable hits of 2010.
Rick Ankiel was acquired from the Kansas City Royals on July 31st, that also brought the Braves RP Kyle Farnsworth, in exchange for OF Gregor Blanco, RP Jesse Chavez, and MiLB LHP Tim Collins.
The Atlanta Braves were getting poor production out of the CF position from a combination of Nate McLouth and Melky Cabrera, so they made a trade to attempt to alleviate the problem. It's funny how things work out, because the speculation was that the Braves were targeting OF David DeJesus from the Royals, but he ended up tearing a tendon in his right thumb, which ultimately shelved him for the season, and in his place was Rick Ankiel, who was essentially not far off from coming back from his own injury (quadricep strain). For whatever reason, the Braves felt that Ankiel was adequate enough to fill their void in CF, despite just 27 games and barely 101 plate appearances, and commenced with the trade that ironically sent off the one player who managed to shine in limited CF duty (Gregor Blanco, with ATL: .310 BA .394 OBP in 36 games).

Offense:
Rick Ankiel wasn't that much of an upgrade over McLouth or Cabrera. Although he took a walk better than his counterparts (13.7% BB%), that was pretty much all he did better. Brought to Atlanta with power in mind, Ankiel's .328 slugging ranks behind Melky's .354 SLG, and barely ahead of McLouth's .322 SLG. Worse off, his isolated power was a career-worst .118 (even compared to his batting stats as a pitcher), for the Braves, which was better than Cabrera (.098 ISO), but worse than McLouth (.132 ISO). Ankiel also had a nasty propensity to strike out with his massive, violent swing. His 35.3% K% is the worst, again, since he was a pitcher for the Cardinals.
The 2010 Rick Ankiel really did not like changeups, needless to say; his LD% was a career worst, and his GB% was a career high; neither of which are necessarily a good thing, and his negligible .210 batting average (for the Braves) is the worst its been since he became a full-time position player in 2007. Only five times in the 47 games Ankiel suited up for the Braves did he notch more than one hit, and his two homers were a disappointment from a guy who hit 11 rally killers in the same amount of games back in 2007.
Defense:
Defense is where Rick Ankiel best earned his keep. Sometimes, you don't need to look at the numbers to be able to know an upgrade when you see one, and a combination of Ankiel's good foot speed, throwing arm, and most importantly, an actual willingness to throw the ball make for improvement. Statistically, in the 325.1 innings that Ankiel manned CF for the Braves, Ankiel posted a UZR of +2.6, simulated to 150 games gives him a UZR/150 of +13.7. Both are vastly superior to Cabrera's -30.4 and McLouth's -31.9 UZR/150s.
Overall:
FanGraphs gives Rick Ankiel a comprehensive WAR of +0.5, due to his defensive contributions. Obviously, had his offense been even close to his career averages, his WAR would have looked a little better, but considering the alternatives: Melky -1.2 WAR, McLouth -1.3 WAR, it's hard to believe that Rick Ankiel was the top CF that the Braves had, ending out the year.
As the numbers-ignoring fan:
From my perspective as solely a fan, a lot of my opinions can easily be justified by the numbers. Far too often, I would watch games with a dreading sense as Ankiel stepped to the plate, and he would hit into numerous 4-3 or 3U's, when he wasn't striking out with his violent swing. Whenever he would nurse out a walk, I would feel a relieved sense of satisfaction at how much better he seemed at being able to do so compared to Melky or McLouth. But overall, I was vastly disappointed with the Rick Ankiel experiment, and would rather have preferred retaining Gregor Blanco, even if it meant also retaining Jesse Chavez.
Although all things considered, Rick Ankiel earned a spot in this fan's heart for his memorable, extra-inning, go-ahead, game-winning, splash-hit home run against the Giants in this year's NLDS. For a team that lived and died with the comeback, I was genuinely glad that Ankiel too, got to have his moment as the hero, among all the others who had.
Next Year:
In all likelihood, Rick Ankiel isn't coming back, unless he's willing to take a major paycut, and even then, it's hard to say if the Braves or their fans would want him back. For 2010, he was playing under a one-year, $3.25M deal, which includes the $500K buyout the Braves will probably exercise, to avoid his $6M mutual option year. His agent is Scott Boras, so it's safe to assume that he's going to spin his witchcraft and get him employed somewhere willing to pay him along the lines of Jim Edmonds, even if it's not in Atlanta.
0 recs | 48 comments
For me, the worst part wasn’t Blanco, but rather Collins. But I may be overestimating his worth.
Doghnut - October 21, 2010
Wasn't Collins the pitcher we scooped from the Blue Jays in the Esco n Gonzo trade?
TCfromDubVee - October 21, 2010
Correct you are.
whodat? - October 21, 2010
It’s funny how in “love” people got with Collins after only having him in organization for roughly 2 weeks or so. Before the Escobar trade, nobody knew who Collins was.
dunnytwogloves - October 21, 2010
Kind of like
How nobody knew who NF was and only had a glimpse of who EA was, after they were packaged to the former Washington Senators, and actually panned out, and people got in arms.
royhobbs - October 21, 2010
Excellent post, royhobbs.
Ankiel was our best 2010 CF (to include Blanco who played very well in limited action), but almost certainly will not be back.
The Braves are in extremely dire need of a legitimate ML CF.
fandave - October 21, 2010
That was the saddest realization
That Rick Ankiel was the best CF of all our options. I wince every time I hear those words.
royhobbs - October 21, 2010
Thank you FANDAVE
At last someone agrees with me, also help if the CF has some damn speed and could hit leadoff and allow Prado to be the #2 hole in the lineup.
Holty_Panthers_Fan - October 21, 2010
If he is "agreeing" with you...
it’s probably just a coincidence.
sddbaker - October 22, 2010
I’d be willing to take Ankiel back for $500k and incentives, if Rasmus is a pipe dream.
I think some of his issues this year may have been injury related. He at least his value as a late-inning defensive replacement.
That said, Matt Young is probably a better option
Broccoman - October 21, 2010
Traditionally
Since CF is perceived as a defensive position, Ankiel is good at that, but still has overall poor on-base skills. For the money that Ankiel wouldn’t accept, Matt Young is far more ideal for a light-hitting, on-base, defensive presence that is pretty adequate at swiping bags from time to time once on. Not that he needs to be the 2011 starting CF, but if nothing better can be done, I’d have no complaints seeing Young out there.
royhobbs - October 21, 2010
The problem is McLouth.
He really isn’t a centerfielder, but his bat isn’t good enough for left and we’re pretty much stuck with him, meaning we probably will trot him out in center at the start of a season hoping for a return to his 2008 form. If he sucks, then Matt Young to replace him/serve as fourth OF/UTL until he takes over makes sense. I don’t know if Young’s on-base skills will be that great in his first major league season (the walks usually translate from the minors, but strikeouts usually increase), but as a fourth OF/UTL/insurance in case we get McSuck again, he makes a lot of sense.
cavebird - October 21, 2010
Small preview of the Diaz review
Which is coming later this day, but . . . Matt Diaz has a better UZR/150 than Nate McLouth in LF. Sure it was only 52 innings, but still . . . let that digest.
royhobbs - October 21, 2010
more reason...
for me to distrust defensive metrics.
Mr. Sanchez - October 21, 2010
It’s like he’s penalized for having a greater range than Diaz. But it’s not exactly hidden knowledge that McLouth sometimes takes poor routes and has the luxury of speed and some athleticism to cover up for a lot of shortcomings. He still doesn’t throw the ball enough, though.
royhobbs - October 21, 2010
I agree
Mr. Sanchez - October 21, 2010
One point on Ankiel
His arm was undoubtedly his best weapon. I recall hearing the radio guys go nuts over two throws he made to nail runners. Many simply didn’t run on him. Certainly could not say that with Nate.
That said, his finest moments with the bat were was that Giants splashdown and the Wrigley Field shocker triple. But I suppose almost any player has a couple of moments during a season like that. The great ones make every at bat a challenge.
carpengui - October 21, 2010
Matt Young’s arm is a noodle compared to Ankiel’s.
I’d let Ankiel see what the market would bear for him, and give him a take it or leave it for under $1mil+ incentives. Ankiel at least brings some useful skills.
Broccoman - October 21, 2010
When it comes to any other player
I don’t ignore that stats because they are what they are. But after that home run in San Francisco, I can’t even look at the stats. He was bad but as a fan, I’ll never get the image of him pointing to the Braves dugout out of my head. Rick, you’re terrible but I don’t care. I love you.
E-Lizz - October 21, 2010 via mobile
Very much so
I won’t forget the strikeouts and the lack of patience, but they’ll blend in with the rest of poor actions that are remembered by a large variety of baseball players. But THE homer will always be remembered as one of those moments that takes our breath away, leaves our voice hoarse, and heads dizzy. A definite anomaly in the millions of baseball plays out there.
royhobbs - October 21, 2010
true
that HR gave me such an emotional high all the way until Sunday afternoon… I watched it over and over and over again… That’s how I’ll remember Ankiel in a Braves uniform
HansonManCrush - October 21, 2010
This
I don’t really want him back on the team in ‘11, but I’m going to remember that splash-bomb-finger point forever.
Darin H - October 21, 2010
Blanco was a poor fit here
I’m not knocking Blanco, but he was a pretty poor fit for the Braves so I can understand him being traded.
1) He drew walks on a team that doesn’t pay attention to OBP. In fact, I am starting to wonder if the Braves are so old school that they don’t pay attention to anything but batting average and home runs.
2) He was essentially a singles hitter on a team desperately starved for power.
3) He was a relatively fast guy on a team that doesn’t run.
cavebird – Matt Young is old for a rookie in MLB. At this point I’m not sure that the Braves have any vision of him as anything but a short term emergency call up.
Zontar - October 21, 2010
it’s a shame that Blanco wasn’t kept (not to knock Ankiel…..but yeah)
Blanco could run circles around McOut.
Chief Noc-A-Homa - October 21, 2010
Is it the Braves, or was it Bobby Cox?
It’s moot now, but Hanley and Bonifacio got their wheels going a lot in Florida under Fredi, and McLouth was running a lot, before coming to Atlanta. Considering the decisions to run and steal are typically from the dugout, from Bobby Cox, and not the front office, I have to theorize that the Braves might actually do some running under a new regime, if those with the adequate wheels are present.
Otherwise, your #2 bullet is dead on. The team was desperate for power, but kind of jumped the gun and made a poor choice. Gregor might have only hit singles, but at least he was hitting.
royhobbs - October 21, 2010
SIngles go a long way today, as opposed to 10 years ago. The game reverted back to it’s true form with all the drug testing.
I’m a bigger Bobby Cox fan than anybody, but I think Fredi is going to be like a shot in the arm for our guys. We might be a little bit more aggressive, in general. And with a new hitting coach, anything will be better than whatever TP was force-feeding them.
I’m already looking forward to 2011 (we all should be very healthy.) I think Fredi is going to be great for this club.
Chief Noc-A-Homa - October 21, 2010
+1
HansonManCrush - October 21, 2010
serious
about the walks? Weren’t the Braves one of the walkingest teams of 2010???
scorby911 - October 21, 2010
… a team that doesn’t pay attention to OBP…
Are we talking about the Braves? The entire offense is built on having lots of guys on base. It’s the one offensive thing that we did WELL this year. Or was I watching a different team?
blwfish - October 21, 2010
yeah, our problem was RISP
which is luck based (you know, BABIP and stuff). Does fangraphs feel we were unlucky?
Londonjoe - October 21, 2010
huh?
First in the league in OBP. First in the league in BB%. What are you talking about?
Braves24 - October 21, 2010
It isn’t hard for me to say: I don’t want Ankiel back. If Ankiel is back in CF next year, then Wren has epicly failed at his job this offseason.
redwards95 - October 21, 2010
Someone mentioned above about bringing him back at low $$ + incentives
If you bring back Ankiel at say $1 million plus incentives and get a big bat in LF and dump McLouth I’d be ok with that, given his arm, speed and defensive capability. Plus a full year of Ankiel could bring 15+ HRs… Not bad if he hits 8. But what do I know…
HansonManCrush - October 21, 2010
My response to that is spend a few more million and get a real CF. I’d rather have a quality CF and find somebody to platoon with McLouth in LF than have Ankiel in CF again.
redwards95 - October 21, 2010
There aren’t that many true CFers on team rosters let alone free agency.
king of games - October 21, 2010
Jason Heyward won ROY!!!
…from Baseball America.
Scott Coleman - October 21, 2010 via mobile
+22
Excellent news.
carpengui - October 21, 2010
Is it just me...
or did anyone else out have flashes of classic film noir cynical private eye every time Ankiel came to the plate? Something about his face makes me picture him in a fedora and suit, smoking a cigarette in a dark alley.
sddbaker - October 21, 2010
Something about his face
Makes me think of G.I. Joe characters, with his perfectly chiseled jaw line, military crew cut, and no-nonsense battle stare on his face.
royhobbs - October 21, 2010
Ha! Yeah, you can certainly say he has a distinctive look.
carpengui - October 21, 2010
I hate Ankiel as a ballplayer.
He just seems so clueless at the plate, on the bases, and in the field. The only time he seems comfortable is when he’s throwing (makes sense for a guy who started as a pitcher, I guess).
That said, he had a great postseason moment for us that I’ll never forget, and he seems like a nice guy who’s been through a lot. I wish him well for the future, though I hope that future is not in Atlanta.
Jacob Peterson - October 21, 2010
Hated so see him at the plate,
but i sure did get excited when some one would hit to center with men on base.
I always try to support the players from mid-season trades. Seems like they have more pressure to come in and perform. Its nice to live in your own little bubble sometimes and just believe what you want to just because you can.
ATL_BUC - October 21, 2010
He did better than the rest of the OF not named Heyward, but that isn’t saying much. That said, I wouldn’t hate it if the Braves brought him back cheap ($1m or less) as an extra outfielder.
ChrisK562 - October 21, 2010
Cabrera, McClouth, Ankiel...
wow – that’s a lot of double plays…
Jaghomer - October 21, 2010
Rick Ankiel is not a good hitter. He’ll run into mistakes and hit them a long way. But he strikes out far too often and gets on base not nearly enough to compensate.
He also takes odd routes to balls that even No Arm Nate would run down. However, his arm is better than anyone I’ve seen in a very long time. I have to admit I’m a bit ambivalent about keeping him on even at severely reduced pay. I certainly don’t want to see his name in the lineup daily.
UMDBHIK - October 21, 2010
Rick Ankiel
I cannot believe that the Braves will have Nate McLouth and Matt Diaz next year. Ankiel is certainly a better choice than these two guys. McLouth was last in every category for an outfielder offensively probably and because of his contract, this dud will be back.
vernbickford - October 21, 2010
Ankiel. Ankiel
Well since Braves original trade target with KC Royals injured his wrist Ankiel was a followup choice. Blanco was decent but nothing great, tried hard just isn’t MLB starting material, although working with Prado really improved his MLB game from the backup role/bench role with limited playing time in ATL this past spring and summer. THe trade from KC I would make again in a heartbeat, but sadly neither Farnsworth or Ankiel return to ATL in 2010. Ankiel has a $6 + option crazy to pay that, and Farnsworth is aging, never cared alot of playing here, but did seem to overcome his demons of pitching in ATL uniform so who knows. Personally I wouldn’t mind retaining Farnsworth and paying the option he has, but he has that clause in his contract from KC that would allow him to opt out of his remaining opt in his current contract from KC originally, so I would seriously doubt ATL can keep him around. More than likely Farnsworth is out on the market again in 2011 offseason.
Holty_Panthers_Fan - October 21, 2010
2010 meant 2011
G-D-IT.
Holty_Panthers_Fan - October 21, 2010
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Talking Chop to post a comment.